bitcoin/bips
1
0 Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bips.git synced 2026-10-19 19:29:18 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity
2,073 Commits 1 Branch 0 Tags
24eddbb48a1d686f70bf33172de602d865a244b4
Commit Graph
50 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Lucas Cullen 4f73814175 Update the link to NBitcoin repo 
NBitcoin official repo has changed.
 2019-03-06 07:51:45 +10:00
Marcos Aguayo 240a6f114c Update bip-0032.mediawiki 2018-10-25 21:16:42 +01:00
Luke Dashjr 973a303edc Merge pull request #556 from rolandgnm/patch-1 
Organizes Recent Changes chronologically .
 2018-02-21 22:18:27 +00:00
Logan Saether 10798af90d typo 'ECSDA' changed to correct 'ECDSA' 
Elliptic curve digital signature algorithm
 2017-09-24 14:01:14 -04:00
MeshCollider 6295c1a095 Fixing spelling in multiple BIPs 2017-09-16 03:12:13 +00:00
Roland Gabriel Molina 895cc06f4f Organizes Recent Changes chronologically . 2017-07-10 19:47:06 +10:00
Ian Coleman 11b0fa37be Mediawiki format used for external links 2017-02-25 15:08:58 +11:00
Ian Coleman 6f94288741 BIP 32: Test vectors for leading zeros 
These additional test vectors will ensure all future implementations are
interoperable.
See https://github.com/iancoleman/bip39/issues/58
and https://github.com/bitpay/bitcore-lib/issues/47
 2017-02-24 10:30:20 +11:00
Luke Dashjr 855eb22004 BIPs 30, 32, 62, 66, and 103: License under BSD-2-Clause terms 
[Thursday, January 19, 2017] [7:46:36 PM UTC] <luke-jr> sipa: if you get a minute, can you give me at least a text-"verbal" ACK for some copyright license to put on BIPs 30, 32, 62, 66, and 103 please? is BSD-2-Clause okay?
[Thursday, January 19, 2017] [7:47:01 PM UTC] <sipa>    luke-jr: ACK on 2-clause BSD for 30,32,62,66,103
[Thursday, January 19, 2017] [7:47:13 PM UTC] <sipa>    (and for any other BIPs I contributed to)
 2017-01-19 19:55:46 +00:00
Luke Dashjr 959fecc15b Promote BIP 2 Draft->Active, and implement it 
- Update all Accepted status to Proposed (renamed status)
- The BIP Comments preamble headers added to every BIP
- The License preamble headers have been added to all BIPs with a Copyright section
 2016-11-30 09:51:01 +00:00
Luke Dashjr 72f18918a8 Promote BIP 123 Draft->Active, and implement it 2016-11-30 09:45:33 +00:00
Robert Jesionek 9ce2c4d351 Update bip-0032.mediawiki 
Added a new Java implementation.
 2016-03-17 18:12:15 +01:00
Luke Dashjr ab90b5289f Merge branch '20160201_status_updates_a2f' 2016-02-12 07:22:58 +00:00
Luke Dashjr 4edd6d2bad Lots of formatting fixes 2016-02-03 07:02:36 +00:00
Luke Dashjr f31f7d4347 Promote Accepted->Final BIPs 11, 14, 21, 22, 23, 31, 32, 34, 35, 37, 65 2016-02-01 20:14:22 +00:00
Luke-Jr 01c5e719d3 Merge pull request #218 from CodeShark/link_and_ack 
Updated C++ library link and added acknowledgement.
 2016-01-18 18:29:15 +00:00
Eric Lombrozo 38ea34dee5 Updated C++ library link and added acknowledgement. 2015-10-09 16:42:38 -04:00
Zach Dexter 31a5fdfb85 Fix ambiguous reference to seed value in BIP32 test vectors 2015-10-09 15:35:04 -04:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan 2ea19daaa0 Merge pull request #131 from drupalnomad/patch-1 
Mention that "Unsecure money receiver" use-case prevents theft
 2015-03-11 14:30:39 +00:00
Manuel Aráoz 2a7e5a00a7 Update BIP32 to add bitcore as implementation 2015-03-05 16:17:42 -03:00
Nicolas Pouillard 987323e36b Add a link to my CLI interface in Haskell 2015-01-15 01:17:06 +01:00
Jonathan Brown d201d139cd Mention that "Unsecure money receiver" use-case prevents theft 2014-12-30 14:22:50 +07:00
Jonas Schnelli f44f68b939 Bip32, fix missing parenthesis 
reported by fenn on #bitcoin-dev [02:59:57]
 2014-12-18 08:45:16 +01:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan 86edfd57dd Merge pull request #122 from jonasschnelli/bip32_secg_link 
fix secg.org secp256k1 docs link
 2014-12-09 08:22:23 +00:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan 2c680ff020 Merge pull request #123 from wink/patch-2 
Update bip32 wiki, repo moved
 2014-12-09 08:20:12 +00:00
Micah Winkelspecht 4a44d1c748 Short one digit in BIP32 doc notes. 2014-11-20 17:44:49 -08:00
Micah Winkelspecht b369978bab Update bip32 wiki, repo moved 2014-11-20 17:34:53 -08:00
Jonas Schnelli 852bf26494 fix secg.org secp256k1 docs link 2014-11-17 12:52:42 +01:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan fcd5045445 Merge pull request #99 from apoelstra/patch-1 
Clarify identifier serialization
 2014-10-15 11:11:38 +02:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan 1ce8320495 Merge pull request #64 from harding/bip32-ancestor-risk 
BIP32: Disambiguate Which Key Is Compromised When Ext. PubKey + PrivKey Are Leaked
 2014-10-15 10:58:22 +02:00
Andrew Poelstra a2029e165b Clarify identifier serialization 
I had a tough time interpreting "serialization of the public key", which is hashed to get the extended key identifier. Since the very next section is "Serialization format [for extended keys]" I thought that I was supposed to use the serialization of the /extended/ public key. Then I noticed "ignoring the chain code", so I tried skipping that part of the extended key serialization. Then I realized that what was meant was "the `K` half of `(K, c)`".
 2014-08-26 19:56:17 -07:00
jurov 3000cd5738 Added Haskell implemetation. 
Tested it and confirm it's functional.
 2014-08-21 21:58:06 +02:00
Dave Collins 25a55ed60f Add BIP0032 Go implementation. 2014-07-22 17:35:46 -05:00
Timothy Hobbs 224faeaa2a Spelling bip 32 2014-07-09 14:20:55 +00:00
David A. Harding 5be4021fa1 Disambiguate Which Key Is Compromised When Ext. PubKey + PrivKey Are Leaked 
I mistakenly inferred from the following clause that a parent extended
public key plus a child private key would be equivalent to knowing the
extended *child* private key---meaning that the *parent* private key was
still secure:

> knowledge of the extended public key + any non-hardened private key
> descending from it is equivalent to knowing the extended private key

This patch's addition of the word "parent" (twice) removes the ambiguity
and may help other readers draw the correct inference that the parent
private key is no longer secure in this case.

I also changed "+" to "plus" to avoid confusion with the actual
mathematical operations used in this BIP.
 2014-05-20 11:34:21 -04:00
Nicolas Dorier fe4685a73c C# implementation 
Github link to a C# implementation
 2014-04-29 15:44:02 +02:00
Olivier Lalonde be336d352d Update bip-0032.mediawiki 2014-04-07 00:15:29 +08:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan 1647c7e6d3 Change date format to ISO 8601 
This came up on the mailing list.

yyyy-mm-dd (ISO 8601) is the internationally accepted format for numeric
dates. This commit changes all BIPs to use that instead of dd-mm-yyyy.
It also updates BIP 0001 to prescribe the new format.
 2014-04-05 13:46:56 +02:00
afk11 0b83886040 Link to PHP implementation of BIP32- Passes test vectors. 2014-03-17 01:25:37 +00:00
Pieter Wuille 6145e1ee1c Merge pull request #12 from sipa/bip32update 
Update BIP32: 'hardened' terminology + explicit conversions
 2014-03-13 16:27:30 +01:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan 780b9b8bd6 Merge pull request #16 from jmcorgan/add-bip32utils-ref 
Added bip32utils Python implementation reference
 2014-02-10 16:01:38 +01:00
Johnathan Corgan de71fc1d15 Added bip32utils Python implementation reference 2014-02-10 06:11:02 -08:00
Oleg Andreev 868bd622ed added link to Objective-C implementation of BIP32 2014-02-04 23:40:15 +01:00
Pieter Wuille 6a418689f3 Update BIP32: 'hardened' terminology + explicit conversions 2014-01-27 15:05:20 +01:00
Chuck 9ffdda8070 Link to Sarchar's JavaScript BIP32 implementation. 2014-01-14 15:01:17 +07:00
Cayman 2ca1e6229c Adding link to Go implementation 2014-01-12 14:05:45 -08:00
Micah Winkelspecht 152cc283a2 Adding link to Ruby implementation 
I had added this link on the wiki, but when the page got moved over to GitHub, the link disappeared.
 2013-12-12 23:38:54 -08:00
Peter Todd d9e890a8f2 Fix formatting 2013-10-21 02:18:47 -04:00
Peter Todd d0ae273977 Archive Revision as of 16:12, 18 October 2013 
https://en.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=BIP_0032&oldid=41827
 2013-10-21 00:52:38 -04:00
Peter Todd 1f64d2b06d Rename to mediawiki extension 2013-10-21 00:32:10 -04:00