frost/bdk
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix(tx_graph)!: Change tx_last_seen to Option<u64>

Browse Source 
Also fixup `test_list_owned_txouts` to check that the right
outputs, utxos, and balance are returned at different local
chain heights.

This fixes an issue where unbroadcast and otherwise non-canonical
transactions were returned from methods `list_chain_txs` and
`Wallet::transactions` because every tx inserted had a last_seen
of 0 making it appear unconfirmed.

Note this commit changes the way `Balance` is represented due to
new logic in `try_get_chain_position` that no longer considers
txs with non-canonical anchors. Before this change, a tx anchored
to a block that is reorged out had a permanent effect on the
pending balance, and now only txs with a last_seen time or an
anchor confirmed in the best chain will return a `ChainPosition`.
This commit is contained in:
valued mammal
2024-05-23 17:33:45 -04:00
parent 324eeb3eb4
commit bbc19c3536
7 changed files with 100 additions and 71 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

47
crates/chain/tests/test_indexed_tx_graph.rs
View File

@@ -116,8 +116,8 @@ fn insert_relevant_txs() {
/// tx1: A Coinbase, sending 70000 sats to "trusted" address. [Block 0]
/// tx2: A external Receive, sending 30000 sats to "untrusted" address. [Block 1]
/// tx3: Internal Spend. Spends tx2 and returns change of 10000 to "trusted" address. [Block 2]
/// tx4: Mempool tx, sending 20000 sats to "trusted" address.
/// tx5: Mempool tx, sending 15000 sats to "untested" address.
/// tx4: Mempool tx, sending 20000 sats to "untrusted" address.
/// tx5: Mempool tx, sending 15000 sats to "trusted" address.
/// tx6: Complete unrelated tx. [Block 3]
///
/// Different transactions are added via `insert_relevant_txs`.
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ fn test_list_owned_txouts() {
let mut untrusted_spks: Vec<ScriptBuf> = Vec::new();
{
// we need to scope here to take immutanble reference of the graph
// we need to scope here to take immutable reference of the graph
for _ in 0..10 {
let ((_, script), _) = graph
.index
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ fn test_list_owned_txouts() {
..common::new_tx(0)
};
// tx5 is spending tx3 and receiving change at trusted keychain, unconfirmed.
// tx5 is an external transaction receiving at trusted keychain, unconfirmed.
let tx5 = Transaction {
output: vec![TxOut {
value: Amount::from_sat(15000),
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ fn test_list_owned_txouts() {
let tx6 = common::new_tx(0);
// Insert transactions into graph with respective anchors
// For unconfirmed txs we pass in `None`.
// Insert unconfirmed txs with a last_seen timestamp
let _ =
graph.batch_insert_relevant([&tx1, &tx2, &tx3, &tx6].iter().enumerate().map(|(i, tx)| {
@@ -291,9 +291,6 @@ fn test_list_owned_txouts() {
|_, spk: &Script| trusted_spks.contains(&spk.to_owned()),
);
assert_eq!(txouts.len(), 5);
assert_eq!(utxos.len(), 4);
let confirmed_txouts_txid = txouts
.iter()
.filter_map(|(_, full_txout)| {
@@ -359,29 +356,25 @@ fn test_list_owned_txouts() {
balance,
) = fetch(0, &graph);
// tx1 is a confirmed txout and is unspent
// tx4, tx5 are unconfirmed
assert_eq!(confirmed_txouts_txid, [tx1.compute_txid()].into());
assert_eq!(
unconfirmed_txouts_txid,
[
tx2.compute_txid(),
tx3.compute_txid(),
tx4.compute_txid(),
tx5.compute_txid()
]
.into()
[tx4.compute_txid(), tx5.compute_txid()].into()
);
assert_eq!(confirmed_utxos_txid, [tx1.compute_txid()].into());
assert_eq!(
unconfirmed_utxos_txid,
[tx3.compute_txid(), tx4.compute_txid(), tx5.compute_txid()].into()
[tx4.compute_txid(), tx5.compute_txid()].into()
);
assert_eq!(
balance,
Balance {
immature: Amount::from_sat(70000), // immature coinbase
trusted_pending: Amount::from_sat(25000), // tx3 + tx5
trusted_pending: Amount::from_sat(15000), // tx5
untrusted_pending: Amount::from_sat(20000), // tx4
confirmed: Amount::ZERO // Nothing is confirmed yet
}
@@ -405,23 +398,26 @@ fn test_list_owned_txouts() {
);
assert_eq!(
unconfirmed_txouts_txid,
[tx3.compute_txid(), tx4.compute_txid(), tx5.compute_txid()].into()
[tx4.compute_txid(), tx5.compute_txid()].into()
);
// tx2 doesn't get into confirmed utxos set
assert_eq!(confirmed_utxos_txid, [tx1.compute_txid()].into());
// tx2 gets into confirmed utxos set
assert_eq!(
confirmed_utxos_txid,
[tx1.compute_txid(), tx2.compute_txid()].into()
);
assert_eq!(
unconfirmed_utxos_txid,
[tx3.compute_txid(), tx4.compute_txid(), tx5.compute_txid()].into()
[tx4.compute_txid(), tx5.compute_txid()].into()
);
assert_eq!(
balance,
Balance {
immature: Amount::from_sat(70000), // immature coinbase
trusted_pending: Amount::from_sat(25000), // tx3 + tx5
trusted_pending: Amount::from_sat(15000), // tx5
untrusted_pending: Amount::from_sat(20000), // tx4
confirmed: Amount::ZERO // Nothing is confirmed yet
confirmed: Amount::from_sat(30_000) // tx2 got confirmed
}
);
}
@@ -477,6 +473,7 @@ fn test_list_owned_txouts() {
balance,
) = fetch(98, &graph);
// no change compared to block 2
assert_eq!(
confirmed_txouts_txid,
[tx1.compute_txid(), tx2.compute_txid(), tx3.compute_txid()].into()
@@ -502,14 +499,14 @@ fn test_list_owned_txouts() {
immature: Amount::from_sat(70000), // immature coinbase
trusted_pending: Amount::from_sat(15000), // tx5
untrusted_pending: Amount::from_sat(20000), // tx4
confirmed: Amount::from_sat(10000) // tx1 got matured
confirmed: Amount::from_sat(10000) // tx3 is confirmed
}
);
}
// AT Block 99
{
let (_, _, _, _, balance) = fetch(100, &graph);
let (_, _, _, _, balance) = fetch(99, &graph);
// Coinbase maturity hits
assert_eq!(