- Replace fe_equal_var with fe_equal
- Use CHECK_ILLEGAL instead of CHECK/ecount
- Turn on secp256k1-zkp specific modules in CI
This commit is contained in:
Jonas Nick
2023-09-19 14:44:41 +00:00
43 changed files with 2063 additions and 1996 deletions

View File

@@ -10,16 +10,25 @@ and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0
## [Unreleased]
## [0.4.0] - 2023-09-04
#### Added
- New module `ellswift` implements ElligatorSwift encoding for public keys and x-only Diffie-Hellman key exchange for them.
ElligatorSwift permits representing secp256k1 public keys as 64-byte arrays which cannot be distinguished from uniformly random. See:
- Header file `include/secp256k1_ellswift.h` which defines the new API.
- Document `doc/ellswift.md` which explains the mathematical background of the scheme.
- The [paper](https://eprint.iacr.org/2022/759) on which the scheme is based.
- We now test the library with unreleased development snapshots of GCC and Clang. This gives us an early chance to catch miscompilations and constant-time issues introduced by the compiler (such as those that led to the previous two releases).
#### Fixed
- Fixed symbol visibility in Windows DLL builds, where three internal library symbols were wrongly exported.
#### Changed
- When consuming libsecp256k1 as a static library on Windows, the user must now define the `SECP256K1_STATIC` macro before including `secp256k1.h`.
#### ABI Compatibility
This release is backward compatible with the ABI of 0.3.0, 0.3.1, and 0.3.2. Symbol visibility is now believed to be handled properly on supported platforms and is now considered to be part of the ABI. Please report any improperly exported symbols as a bug.
## [0.3.2] - 2023-05-13
We strongly recommend updating to 0.3.2 if you use or plan to use GCC >=13 to compile libsecp256k1. When in doubt, check the GCC version using `gcc -v`.
@@ -100,7 +109,8 @@ This version was in fact never released.
The number was given by the build system since the introduction of autotools in Jan 2014 (ea0fe5a5bf0c04f9cc955b2966b614f5f378c6f6).
Therefore, this version number does not uniquely identify a set of source files.
[unreleased]: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/compare/v0.3.2...HEAD
[unreleased]: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/compare/v0.4.0...HEAD
[0.4.0]: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/compare/v0.3.2...v0.4.0
[0.3.2]: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/compare/v0.3.1...v0.3.2
[0.3.1]: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/compare/v0.3.0...v0.3.1
[0.3.0]: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/compare/v0.2.0...v0.3.0