This simplifies building without a build system.
This is in line with #925; the paths fixed here were either forgotten
there or only introduced later. This commit also makes the Makefile
stricter so that further "wrong" #include paths will lead to build
errors even in autotools builds.
This belongs to #929.
Co-authored-by: Hennadii Stepanov <32963518+hebasto@users.noreply.github.com>
49e2acd927 configure: Improve rationale for WERROR_CFLAGS (Tim Ruffing)
8dc4b03341 ci: Add a C++ job that compiles the public headers without -fpermissive (Tim Ruffing)
51f296a46c ci: Run persistent wineserver to speed up wine (Tim Ruffing)
3fb3269c22 ci: Add 32-bit MinGW64 build (Tim Ruffing)
9efc2e5221 ci: Add MSVC builds (Tim Ruffing)
2be6ba0fed configure: Convince autotools to work with MSVC's archiver lib.exe (Tim Ruffing)
bd81f4140a schnorrsig bench: Suppress a stupid warning in MSVC (Tim Ruffing)
09f3d71c51 configure: Add a few CFLAGS for MSVC (Tim Ruffing)
3b4f3d0d46 build: Reject C++ compilers in the preprocessor (Tim Ruffing)
1cc0941414 configure: Don't abort if the compiler does not define __STDC__ (Tim Ruffing)
cca8cbbac8 configure: Output message when checking for valgrind (Tim Ruffing)
1a6be5745f bench: Make benchmarks compile on MSVC (Tim Ruffing)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
jonasnick:
ACK 49e2acd927
Tree-SHA512: 986c498fb218231fff3519167d34a92e11dea6a4383788a9723be105c20578cd483c6b06ba5686c6669e3a02cfeebc29b8e5f1428552ebf4ec67fa7a86957548
This is a backwards-compatible API change: Before this commit, a context
initialized for signing was required to call functions that rely on
ecmult_gen. After this commit, this is no longer necessary because the
static ecmult_gen table is always present. In practice this means that
the corresponding functions will just work instead of calling the
illegal callback when given a context which is not (officially)
initialized for signing.
This is in line with 6815761, which made the analogous change with
respect to ecmult and contexts initialized for signing. But as opposed
to 681571, which removed the ecmult context entirely, we cannot remove
the ecmult_gen context entirely because it is still used for random
blinding. Moreover, since the secp256k1_context_no_precomp context is
const and cannot meaningfully support random blinding, we refrain (for
now) from changing its API, i.e., the illegal callback will still be
called when trying to use ecmult_gen operations with the static
secp256k1_context_no_precomp context.
BIP340's default signing algorithm always requires an aux_rnd argument,
but permits using an all-zero one when no randomness is available.
Make secp256k1_schnorrsig_sign follow this even when aux_rnd32==NULL,
by treating the same as if an all-zero byte array was provided as
input.
72713872a8 Add missing static to secp256k1_schnorrsig_sign_internal (Elichai Turkel)
Pull request description:
This function isn't used outside of this module so it should be declared static
ACKs for top commit:
real-or-random:
ACK 72713872a8
jonasnick:
ACK 72713872a8
Tree-SHA512: 6107a2c84c3e11ffd68de22a5288d989a3c71c2ec1ee4827c88f6165fc27ef8339d0f6740928540e8ccd03aff49a2a96149bf698ccebe6d6d8ad6e23e38e8838
adec5a1638 Add missing null check for ctx and input keys in the public API (Elichai Turkel)
f4edfc7581 Improve consistency for NULL arguments in the public interface (Elichai Turkel)
Pull request description:
I went over the public API and added missing explanations on when a pointer can be null and when it cannot,
and added some missing checks for null ctx and null pubkey pointers.
Open questions IMHO:
1. Can `secp256k1_context_create` return NULL? right now it could return null if you replaced the callbacks at compile time to ones that do return(unlike the default ones which never return).
2. Related to the first, should we document that the callbacks should never return? (in the tests we use returning callbacks but we can violate our own API) right now we say the following:
> After this callback returns, anything may happen, including crashing.
Is this enough to document answer `no` for the first question and just saying that if the callback returned then you violated the API so `secp256k1_context_create` can return NULL even though it is promised not to?
Right now we AFAICT we never check if it returns null
Another nit I'm not sure about is wording `(does nothing if NULL)`/`(ignored if NULL)`/`(can be NULL)`
More missing docs:
1. Documenting the `data` argument to the default nonce functions
ACKs for top commit:
ariard:
ACK adec5a16
jonasnick:
ACK adec5a1638
Tree-SHA512: 6fe785776b7e451e9e8cae944987f927b1eb2e2d404dfcb1b0ceb0a30bda4ce16469708920269417e5ada09739723a430e270dea1868fe7d12ccd5699dde5976
unsigned char foo[4] = "abcd" is not valid C++ because the string
literal "abcd" does not fit into foo due to the terminating NUL
character. This is valid in C, it will just omit the NUL character.
Fixes#962.
Varlen message support for the default sign function comes from recommending
tagged_sha256. sign_custom on the other hand gets the ability to directly sign
message of any length. This also implies signing and verification support for
the empty message (NULL) with msglen 0.
Tests for variable lengths follow in a later commit.
This makes the default sign function easier to use while allowing more granular
control through sign_custom.
Tests for sign_custom follow in a later commit.
33cb3c2b1f Add secret key extraction from keypair to constant time tests (Elichai Turkel)
36d9dc1e8e Add seckey extraction from keypair to the extrakeys tests (Elichai Turkel)
fc96aa73f5 Add a function to extract the secretkey from a keypair (Elichai Turkel)
Pull request description:
With schnorrsig if you need to tweak the secret key (for BIP32) you must use the keypair API to get compatible secret/public keys which you do by calling `secp256k1_keypair_xonly_tweak_add()`, but after that there's no currently a way to extract the secret key back for storage.
so I added a `secp256k1_keypair_seckey` function to extract the key
ACKs for top commit:
jonasnick:
ACK 33cb3c2b1f
real-or-random:
ACK 33cb3c2b1f code inspection, tests pass
Tree-SHA512: 11212db38c8b87a87e2dc35c4d6993716867b45215b94b20522b1b3164ca63d4c6bf5192a6bff0e9267b333779cc8164844c56669a94e9be72df9ef025ffcfd4
As identified in #829 and #833. Fixes#829.
Since we touch this anyway, this commit additionally makes the
identifiers in the benchmark files a little bit more consistent.
This enables testing overflow is correctly encoded in the recid, and
likely triggers more edge cases.
Also introduce a Sage script to generate the parameters.
